As an agnostic who professed Christianity for most of my life, I often encounter the “No True Scotsman” argument from well-meaning Christians. Basically, they insist that if I have in fact fallen away from the faith, my faith must not have been genuine. Unfortunately, this belief, which is likely grounded in fear (if I was a true Christian and yet fell away, how could they be sure of their own or anyone else’s faith?) is simply baseless, and in my increasing irritation at its repetition, I almost feel like calling it slander. Read More
I think one of the underlying themes that drives Christian revisionist history (the attempt by Christian conservatism to assert that the Founding Fathers were all Christians and founded America exclusively on explicitly Christian principles) is the belief that religion and morality are inseparable — that one’s religion determines one’s morality. The understanding, of course, is that Christianity is the only route to a valid ethical foundation, and that atheism or neutrality in religion necessarily entails a lack of any moral basis at best (and at worst requires inverting “Christian” morality so that evil is lauded and good condemned). Read More
As I’ve been posting and sharing a variety of gun-related status updates, images, etc. on Facebook lately, I thought it might be helpful to elucidate what exactly is my personal position on guns, gun ownership, gun rights, and so forth. Read More
Sometimes I still catch myself wondering if I might be wrong after all, if perhaps the conservatives and fundamentalists are right, if perhaps there is a God and he is a stern God and he will throw my ass in eternal torment for daring to question his existence. After all, whatever does not proceed from faith is sin, and if I’m questioning him with logic and reason, I obviously don’t have faith, since faith is the conviction of things not seen.
Then I have to take a step back, breathe, and remind myself of the basic tenets of my agnosticism. Read More
It wasn’t enough that they interfere with the private lives of their employees and strongly suggest that marital problems may be grounds for termination.
It wasn’t enough that they publicly condemn homosexuality for “inviting God’s judgment” by being “prideful, arrogant,” and “shak[ing] our fist at Him”.
It wasn’t enough that they donate money to organizations that attack equality, including a known “hate group” that lobbied in support of executing gays.
Now they are blatantly and illegally defying the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, defending their actions with catchphrases representative of a very small, conservative sector of Christianity that has absolutely no right to interfere in the secular business arena. Chick-Fil-A is a for-profit corporation operating in the public sector, and as such, absolutely cannot use “religion” to defend their illegal discriminatory activity.
We are, indeed, intolerant. We will not tolerate religion forcing its way into the public sector in a way that impedes the public’s ability to do business. We will not tolerate organizations openly scorning the laws by which they are bound to operate. And WE WILL NOT stand by while the rights of defenseless women, families, and minorities are laughed at, ridiculed, trampled, and condemned. Not in our country. Not on our watch.
Conservatives like to complain about how people on “welfare” (government assistance programs) are living on taxpayer money without having to give an ounce of effort. Some of the programs typically targeted include food stamps, government-sponsored healthcare (Medicare/Medicaid), and unemployment insurance. I’m going to take a look at what those programs actually comprise in my home state of Oklahoma. (This post will not cover the complex issue of government-sponsored housing options, which in my area have pretty reasonable income guidelines but also incredibly long wait periods due to a lack of available properties.) Read More
One person can smoke a single cigarette once and develop lung cancer. Another person can smoke a pack a day for fifty years and never suffer from the slightest tumor. Everybody is built differently. This does not mean that smoking is harmless or should be encouraged, and to argue otherwise is to prove oneself either stupidly ignorant or willfully biased in favor of a disproven and groundless claim. Read More
When sources like this one compare Planned Parenthood’s abortion statistics to Hitler’s genocide in WWII, I can’t help but think of a much greater holocaust that goes unreported by the media and often even unnoticed by those it most affects. Note: We will assume, for the sake of this discussion, that life begins at the moment of conception. My views on this subject will be discussed in a forthcoming post.
Warning: boring entry. I’m primarily posting this for my personal amusement.
A few years ago, having been raised my whole life to believe that “minced oaths” (gosh, heck, darn, etc.) were just as bad as “actual oaths” (God, hell, damn, etc.), I decided to take a microscope to the whole interjection issue and uncover the definition and origin of as many interjections as I could think of, to determine which ones were “acceptable” and which ones were not, and why. Since then (and a good while before my entire religion began to collapse), I decided that words are just words, noting that the third commandment is a directive on lifestyle, not word choice (another person’s explanation here). However, I recently ran across my old “minced oaths” research, and thought I’d post it here … mainly for laughs. Read More
The Bible talks about a worldwide flood;
Could the fossils be the proof we see?
If there really was a worldwide flood,
What would the evidence be?
Billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth….
Well there really was a worldwide flood;
Just look at the stony curse,
With billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth!